0.11/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 960
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 05:19:14 EDT 2022
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.18/0.45	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.18/0.45	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.18/0.45	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.18/0.46	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHSN.
0.18/0.46	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.18/0.46	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.18/0.46	# Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# Starting lpo8_s with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# Starting new_bool_11 with 120s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 29249 completed with status 0
0.18/0.46	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.18/0.46	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHSN.
0.18/0.46	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.18/0.46	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.18/0.46	# No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.46	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF11-SHSFMMBN
0.18/0.46	# partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHSFMMBN
0.18/0.46	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.18/0.46	# Starting new_ho_10 with 325s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 61s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# Starting new_bool_1 with 55s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# Starting new_bool_2 with 55s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# Starting new_bool_9 with 55s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 29256 completed with status 0
0.18/0.46	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.18/0.46	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHSN.
0.18/0.46	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.18/0.46	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.18/0.46	# No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.46	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF11-SHSFMMBN
0.18/0.46	# partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHSFMMBN
0.18/0.46	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.18/0.46	# Starting new_ho_10 with 325s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 61s (1) cores
0.18/0.46	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.18/0.46	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.18/0.46	
0.18/0.46	# Proof found!
0.18/0.46	# SZS status Theorem
0.18/0.46	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.18/0.46	thf(decl_22, type, c: $i).
0.18/0.46	thf(decl_23, type, cQDP0: $i > $o).
0.18/0.46	thf(decl_24, type, cQDP1: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.18/0.46	thf(decl_25, type, esk1_1: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.18/0.46	thf(decl_26, type, esk2_2: $i > $i > $i).
0.18/0.46	thf(cQDP1_def, axiom, ((cQDP1)=(^[X2:$i > $o]:((((X2)=(cQDP0))&?[X3:$i]:((X2 @ X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cQDP1_def)).
0.18/0.46	thf(cQDP0_def, axiom, ((cQDP0)=(^[X1:$i]:(((X1)=(c))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cQDP0_def)).
0.18/0.46	thf(cQDTHM1, conjecture, ?[X4:$i > $o]:((cQDP1 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cQDTHM1)).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_3, plain, ((cQDP1)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:((((Z0)=(^[Z1:$i]:(((Z1)=(c)))))&?[X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cQDP1_def])).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((cQDP0)=(^[Z0:$i]:(((Z0)=(c))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cQDP0_def])).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((cQDP1)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:((((Z0)=(^[Z1:$i]:(((Z1)=(c)))))&?[X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X4:$i > $o]:((![X7:$i]:(((X4 @ X7)<=>((X7)=(c))))&?[X6:$i]:((X4 @ X6))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cQDTHM1]), c_0_5])])).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X8:$i > $o, X10:$i]:(((~(X8 @ (esk1_1 @ X8))|((esk1_1 @ X8)!=(c))|~(X8 @ X10))&((X8 @ (esk1_1 @ X8))|((esk1_1 @ X8)=(c))|~(X8 @ X10)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(((X2 @ (esk1_1 @ X2))|((esk1_1 @ X2)=(c))|~((X2 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((Z0)=(X1)))))=(c))|((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((Z0)=(X1)))))=(X1)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_8])).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:((~((X2 @ (esk1_1 @ X2)))|((esk1_1 @ X2)!=(c))|~((X2 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((Z0)=(c)))))=(c)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])).
0.18/0.46	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])])])]), ['proof']).
0.18/0.46	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.18/0.46	# Parsed axioms                        : 6
0.18/0.46	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.18/0.46	# Initial clauses                      : 5
0.18/0.46	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
0.18/0.46	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
0.18/0.46	# Processed clauses                    : 7
0.18/0.46	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.18/0.46	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.18/0.46	# ...remaining for further processing  : 7
0.18/0.46	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
0.18/0.46	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.18/0.46	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.18/0.46	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.18/0.46	# Generated clauses                    : 18
0.18/0.46	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
0.18/0.46	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.18/0.46	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.18/0.46	# Paramodulations                      : 3
0.18/0.46	# Factorizations                       : 2
0.18/0.46	# NegExts                              : 1
0.18/0.46	# Equation resolutions                 : 8
0.18/0.46	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.18/0.46	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.18/0.46	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.18/0.46	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.18/0.46	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.18/0.46	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.18/0.46	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.18/0.46	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.18/0.46	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.18/0.46	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.18/0.46	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.18/0.46	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.18/0.46	# Current number of processed clauses  : 5
0.18/0.46	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.18/0.46	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.18/0.46	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.18/0.46	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
0.18/0.46	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
0.18/0.46	# ...number of literals in the above   : 18
0.18/0.46	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.18/0.46	# Current number of archived clauses   : 2
0.18/0.46	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
0.18/0.46	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
0.18/0.46	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.18/0.46	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
0.18/0.46	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.18/0.46	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.18/0.46	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.18/0.46	# Condensation attempts                : 7
0.18/0.46	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.18/0.46	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 546
0.18/0.46	
0.18/0.46	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.46	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.18/0.46	# System time              : 0.000 s
0.18/0.46	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.18/0.46	# Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
0.18/0.46	
0.18/0.46	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.46	# User time                : 0.013 s
0.18/0.46	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.18/0.46	# Total time               : 0.017 s
0.18/0.46	# Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
0.18/0.46	EOF